tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32424382.post8847715126346609067..comments2024-01-31T16:44:50.071-05:00Comments on La Contra Revolución: Carlos on ErnestoGusanohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09338808907114840043noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32424382.post-16766309180213595832007-03-31T10:58:00.000-04:002007-03-31T10:58:00.000-04:00Carlos EsCheFan and the My Hammy Che-ound MaCheNCarlos EsCheFan and the My Hammy Che-ound MaCheNAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32424382.post-23822593585841824922007-03-29T12:38:00.000-04:002007-03-29T12:38:00.000-04:00Couldn't say it better. If Carlitos wore a shirt ...Couldn't say it better. If Carlitos wore a shirt with the dead che-shit's image on it, he might score some points on sincerity and credibility. Otherwise, que se deje de tanta pendejeria.Albert Quirogahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00068108543684588764noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32424382.post-39769434341752214222007-03-29T11:49:00.000-04:002007-03-29T11:49:00.000-04:00The problem with the Santana "apology" is that the...The problem with the Santana "apology" is that the statement wasn't written by him. It was written by his management ABOUT him. It doesn't even incorporate a quote from him. <BR/><BR/>Then there's the little problem of the missing words. Thos words would be "regret" or "sorry" or "apologize" etc. etc.<BR/><BR/>No instead this is a declaration by a third party about what the artist's intentions were. If we misinterpreted the artists intentions then it's our fault. <BR/><BR/>Sorry Santana, no.Henry Louis Gomezhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03167391252653145914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32424382.post-48341468251913011662007-03-29T11:33:00.000-04:002007-03-29T11:33:00.000-04:00This was not a mistake by the E$tefans. Why out of...This was not a mistake by the E$tefans. Why out of thousand of artist honestly sympathetic with the Cuban cause pick the more controversial, the one that they know will provoke our outrage. This was no mistake. Recent events envolving other artist show that controversy add big $$ to their packets. Ask Mel Gibson or Madonna about it. The E$tefan are just following a trend with no regard for the Cuban community feelings for this issue knowing that our reaction will provoke higher interest for the DC by potential buyers. And will also, as I mentioned in my previous comment, open a possible new market for them. Shame on them!<BR/><BR/>I will have not problem with the E$tefan if they had participated in a project with Santana that do not carry the name “90 Miles” and is suppose to be a tribute to our people. This is an insult to the memory of all Cuban that had die in the hands of the Castro’s tyranny. I also consider that because of the name non-cuban artist must not be included in the project regardless of their solidarity for our cause. If they want to bring other artist sympathetic to our cause to the project let change the name of the CD. For instance “United for Cuba” or something of that sort will do betterAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32424382.post-29137770024211946812007-03-29T09:50:00.000-04:002007-03-29T09:50:00.000-04:00we'll see, Jose.hahaha E$tefans. it makes no sense...we'll see, Jose.<BR/>hahaha E$tefans. it makes no sense to me that they would risk the repect of their own to make $$$ , they got plenty.<BR/>Tremenda Novela! stay tuned!Gusanohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09338808907114840043noreply@blogger.com